[romefloydhumanesocietychairs] Re: micro-chipping - FYI

  • From: Richard Landry <fivestar1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 19:20:31 -0400

I have long been a fan of Janie Jones and her huge efforts to help animals,
especially from Animal Control.  I am very glad to hear that you will be
helping her.  You will have my support when needed, as Janie is already
aware.

Thanks for the update.

Dick

Email messages authored and distributed by the sender are intended as
private communications.

Do not Forward or CC or Bcc without the writers consent.

Lonestar Coastal 727-804-4235   Pilgrim Self Storage 770-749-1104   Living
and Giving  706-235-5530   Rome/Floyd Humane Society


*Of this there can be no doubt: when you save a single animal, or do
something to improve the conditions in which it lives, you have changed the
world.*








On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Florice Schneider <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> FYI, Janie Jones is doing most of the pulling. I am going to help her in
> anyway I can to get these dogs to a safe environment. Janie is an unsung
> hero, and I have volunteered to help her
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Landry <fivestar1@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: romefloydhumanesocietychairs <
> romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Fri, May 9, 2014 2:59 pm
> Subject: [romefloydhumanesocietychairs] Re: micro-chipping - FYI
>
>  gotta wonder where the money goes.....  not only what $ AC gets, but
> what it doesn't get that it's supposed to....  The Director is a "yes man"
> to the asst county manager and thus the commissioners.  They all are
> terrified of loosing their positions if they raise taxes, so the animals
> suffer.  The animal welfare board does zero, zilch, nada....
>
>  I need to get back to the law books to determine exactly what the county
> is obligated to provide for the animals it takes in.  It is after all, a
> shelter that is licensed by Dept of Ag. and subject to their requirements
> and minumum standards.  I know JB makes it his call on most things but he
> oversteps his authority in some decisions.
>
>  He has a rule that there must be 12 empty cages at all times.  Huh?
>  Most good shelters have just the opposite rule, there being no euthanisia
> of a healthy animal if even one empty cage exists.   He has a rule stating
> no cameras allowed,  he has a rule that a person cannot "bad-mouth" AC
> practices or personnel while on the premises.  He has in the past ignored
> ambient temperature requirements and probably still does.   The inmates
> feed, water the animals and clean the place, but who gives the animals
> water on Sundays, especially through the summer??
>
>  Bottom line is this...   AC gets credit for a low euthanasia rate, but
> in truth, it's a small number of rescuers, maybe three or four  people, who
> do almost all the pulling, and if they were to get sick, move away or quit,
> the euthanasia rate would skyrocket.
>
>  A lot of issues need to be addressed before the county spends 5+ million
> $$$ on a new facility.
>
>  Dick
>
>   Email messages authored and distributed by the sender are intended as
> private communications.
> Do not Forward or CC or Bcc without the writers consent.
> Lonestar Coastal 727-804-4235   Pilgrim Self Storage 770-749-1104
> Living and Giving  706-235-5530   Rome/Floyd Humane Society
>
>  *Of this there can be no doubt: when you save a single animal, or do
> something to improve the conditions in which it lives, you have changed the
> world.*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Redacted sender BWTerry2575@xxxxxxx for
> DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>  *Is this something that should be done?; wWe would have to list reasons
>> why. If so, how can we facilitate it being instituted?   benny      delete
>> key not working *
>>
>>  In a message dated 5/9/2014 12:01:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> jeanie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>>  There was discussion at the meeting last night re: micro-chipping.
>> Someone stated that FCAC micro-chips adopted pets (for an add'l fee) when
>> adopted through them. I called today and that is NOT true. They have not
>> done this in over 5 years. Yet another thing that was eliminated due to
>> "budget", Vickie said.
>>
>> Jeanie
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: