[romefloydhumanesocietychairs] Re: micro-chipping - FYI
- From: "Jeanie Waddell" <jeanie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 13:20:50 -0400
This is something you can bring up at the FCAC committee meetings. They charge
$40 adoption fee and have no money in the animals. Food is donated, RFHS pays
for shots, other people/rescue groups have bought KC drugs, etc. FCAC need to
make it a priority in their mind and then they would put forth the effort (and
money) to do it. As long as others continue to pay for their stuff, they will
not do so themselves.
They used to do it. They just continue to spend less and less on the
animals…sad. They would be better off to let one of the AC officers go and take
that $30k a year or so and put toward medical care/chips/necessities for the
animals, IMO.
Jeanie
From: romefloydhumanesocietychairs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:romefloydhumanesocietychairs-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Redacted sender "BWTerry2575@xxxxxxx" for DMARC
Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 12:35 PM
To: romefloydhumanesocietychairs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [romefloydhumanesocietychairs] Re: micro-chipping - FYI
Is this something that should be done?; wWe would have to list reasons why. If
so, how can we facilitate it being instituted? benny delete key not
working
In a message dated 5/9/2014 12:01:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
jeanie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
There was discussion at the meeting last night re: micro-chipping. Someone
stated that FCAC micro-chips adopted pets (for an add’l fee) when adopted
through them. I called today and that is NOT true. They have not done this in
over 5 years. Yet another thing that was eliminated due to “budget”, Vickie
said.
Jeanie
Other related posts:
