gotta wonder where the money goes..... not only what $ AC gets, but what it doesn't get that it's supposed to.... The Director is a "yes man" to the asst county manager and thus the commissioners. They all are terrified of loosing their positions if they raise taxes, so the animals suffer. The animal welfare board does zero, zilch, nada.... I need to get back to the law books to determine exactly what the county is obligated to provide for the animals it takes in. It is after all, a shelter that is licensed by Dept of Ag. and subject to their requirements and minumum standards. I know JB makes it his call on most things but he oversteps his authority in some decisions. He has a rule that there must be 12 empty cages at all times. Huh? Most good shelters have just the opposite rule, there being no euthanisia of a healthy animal if even one empty cage exists. He has a rule stating no cameras allowed, he has a rule that a person cannot "bad-mouth" AC practices or personnel while on the premises. He has in the past ignored ambient temperature requirements and probably still does. The inmates feed, water the animals and clean the place, but who gives the animals water on Sundays, especially through the summer?? Bottom line is this... AC gets credit for a low euthanasia rate, but in truth, it's a small number of rescuers, maybe three or four people, who do almost all the pulling, and if they were to get sick, move away or quit, the euthanasia rate would skyrocket. A lot of issues need to be addressed before the county spends 5+ million $$$ on a new facility. Dick Email messages authored and distributed by the sender are intended as private communications. Do not Forward or CC or Bcc without the writers consent. Lonestar Coastal 727-804-4235 Pilgrim Self Storage 770-749-1104 Living and Giving 706-235-5530 Rome/Floyd Humane Society *Of this there can be no doubt: when you save a single animal, or do something to improve the conditions in which it lives, you have changed the world.* On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Redacted sender BWTerry2575@xxxxxxx for DMARC <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > *Is this something that should be done?; wWe would have to list reasons > why. If so, how can we facilitate it being instituted? benny delete > key not working * > > In a message dated 5/9/2014 12:01:10 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > jeanie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > There was discussion at the meeting last night re: micro-chipping. > Someone stated that FCAC micro-chips adopted pets (for an add'l fee) when > adopted through them. I called today and that is NOT true. They have not > done this in over 5 years. Yet another thing that was eliminated due to > "budget", Vickie said. > > > > Jeanie > >