[rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Argomania
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:31:36 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "David Sadowski" <dsadowski@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2010 10:39 AM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: [rolleiusers] Argomania
I recall the film dimensions of 828 were 28x40mm. This
would suggest
that they used 35mm film without the sprocket holes.
Reduce the image
to a square, add the film cassette, and you have 828. So
there does
seem to be a connection between the two film formats- they
apparently
used the same basic film stock. They also carried over
the one-notch
per frame system.
---
Rollei List
I also seem to remember that this was unperforated 35mm
film. The answer may be in the support thickness if anyone
can find a spec for it. 35mm film is on a thicker support
than roll film. Unperforated 35mm film was also sold for
some special applications.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
