[rollei_list] Re: looks like it is the end for agfa
- From: Ardeshir Mehta <ardeshir@xxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:29:25 -0400
On 29-May-05, at 2:04 AM, John A. Lind wrote:
> At 10:35 PM 5/28/2005, you wrote:
>
>
>> On 28-May-05, at 10:24 PM, John A. Lind wrote:
>>
>>
>>> [...] I've also found that if color balancing is off in printing,
>>> in nearly any direction, it can make prints look dull and lifeless.
>>>
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>> And what about Photoshop? Can't one get back some saturation with
>> Photoshop?
>
> Perhaps . . . but why not get it right "in camera" with an
> appropriate film at the outset and then print it properly on an
> optical enlarger using print materials suited for it (what was
> originally envisioned)? Seems much easier (to me).
I agree - but sometimes the only 120-size film available at the local
camera shop I visit most often is Portrait film. (To get Velvia, etc.
I have to travel much farther.)
> -- John Lind
> (confirmed and firmly entrenched Luddite)
Heh-heh!
Cheers.
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
