Carlos, Thank You for your detailed information. I search through my set of Rolleiflex books and also the Internet. I was not able to find this type of information. Basing on what you wrote, was the 10 blade aperture use to deplete their stock before moving onto the newer 5 blade aperture? That would make sense not to waste. Good to know that its a transition camera in the making. I will shoot a roll through before sending it off for a cla. Thank You for identifying what I have. Evan On Sunday, May 18, 2014 10:40 AM, CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hello Evan: According my knowledge, all Compur shutters used for the Automat series from 1937 up to about 1953/54 - Compur Rapid CR00, CR00 X, Synchro Compur Rapid CR 00 MX, Compur Rapid CR 0 X 1/400s, Compur Rapid CR 0 MX 1/500s, Synchro Compur (Rapid) CR 0 MXV- have the 10 blades diaphragm. Your camera is within the first serial block for the MX-EVS, it already has the Compur shutter with linear shutter speeds, but it's very possible with the 10 blades diaphragm yet, a transition model. My Rolleicord IV manufactured up to September 1954 has the Synchro Compur CR 00 MX (Rapid, non linear shutter speeds and special spring for 1/500) with a 10 blades diaphragm. Carlos 2014-05-18 9:48 GMT-03:00 Evan Dong <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Carlos, > > Thank You for the breakdown of the MV-EVS series of Rolleiflex. > > I found that these series are better built when compared to the Rolleiflex > T. > > I am in the process of selling off the Rolleifex T, to be replace by the > MX-EVS Type 1 & 2. > Of course condition is paramount, especially for the optics. > > In my most recent purchase of a MX-EVS, I notice the actual shape of the > aperture to be round. I compared it against my other MV-EVS Type 1 & 2, plus > the Rolleiflex T. Beside this one MX-EVS, the other Rolleiflex has the five > blade aperture shape of a pentagon. > > I thought that only the 2.8C had the 10 blade aperture ad no other > Rolleiflex camera afterwards. I was a tad surprise, so decide to ask for > clarification. > I searched eBay, as many variations are posted here and did find one example > with plenty of photos. > > http://www.ebay.com/itm/Rolleiflex-3-5-A-Automat-6x6-10-BLADES-MX-K4A-TLR-ZEISS-OPTON-TESSAR-75-3-5-/351025366961 > > For Marc, collector of Zeiss Serial Number: > Here are some of the serial numbers to help identify it. > Body: 1449149 > View Lens: 689439 > Taking Lens: Carl Zeiss Tessar 1326936 > > With the exception of the 10 blade aperture, this camera appears to be a > standard MX-EVS Type 1. > > Hope that this additional information will help. > > Thanks in advance, > Evan > > > On Sunday, May 18, 2014 7:58 AM, CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > You can see the Rolleiflex 3.5B or MX-EVS with the first EVS version, > mentioned in my post, in one of my blogs; it's the rare model with the > word "Germany" in the diaphragm wheel; it's the finfth image (click on > the thumbnail): > > http://dobleobjetivo.blogspot.com.ar/2006/10/rollei-news-7-1954-brochure.html > > Carlos > > 2014-05-18 8:21 GMT-03:00 CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>: >> I can answer about the MX-EVS taking info from Prochnow Rollei Report >> II and my own experience. The MX-EVS is the 3.5B for this author, he >> does not distinguish Type 1 or Type 2 but there are some differences >> within this model, enough for other authors to distinguish 1 and 2. >> This was the first Rolleiflex TLR with EVS system, it was manufactured >> between April 1954 till September 1956, there were two serial numbers >> blocks for this camera:1,428,000 till 1,499,999 and 1,700,000 till >> 1,737,999.- 94,000 3.5B or MX-EVS were manufactured. The camera was >> provided with three different taking lens:Tessar 3.5/75 (Carl Zeiss >> Jena), Opton Tessar 3.5/75 (Carl Zeiss Oberkochen), Xenar 3.5/75 >> (Schneider). This camera used the linear Synchro Compur CR00 MX for >> the EVS for the first time in a Rolleiflex. From the camera serial >> number 1,700,000 (starting the second serial numbers block) were >> introduced improvements for the EVS, f.e. the neutral or free >> position. For the author Evans these improvements are enough to call >> the 3.5B "MX-EVS Type 2" from the serial number 1,700,000.- >> >> There were three technical moments for the EVS development. We can >> find the first moment in the firsts 3.5B or MX-EVS Type 1 cameras, >> these cameras don't have the middle button in the diaphragm wheel to >> lock-unlock the system, these cameras are from the serial number >> 1,428,000 till 1,464,000 (this complete block is till 1,499,999). Some >> of these rare firsts MX-EVS have the word "Germany" in the diaphragm >> wheel, Prochnow shows a photograph in 16-358. I think this camera is >> rare today, the serial numbers block is shared with the 2.8C.- The >> second technical moment for the EVS was the central button that you >> need to maintain pressed to unlock the EVS, it was added from the >> serial numbers 1,464,000 till 1,499,999, I think this camera is well >> known and in general the users indentify it as "MX-EVS type 1", but >> really it is a second EVS evolution. Prochnow shows a front panel >> photograph also in 16-358.- The 3.5B "MX-EVS" Type 2 (according Evans >> name) has the EVS mechanism more perfectioned with the free wheel or >> neutral wheel position, avoiding to maintain pressed the button to >> unlock the EVS, this system is also used in the 2.8D, E, 3,5E and >> other Rolleiflex models (some Rolleicords and T also have EVS but the >> means to set it are different), this is a third evolution, Prochnow >> shows a front panel also in 16-358. This evolution started in the >> second serial numbers block for the 3.5B, 1,700,000 till 1,737,999.- >> >> Carlos >> >> 2014-05-18 0:05 GMT-03:00 Evan Dong <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >>> I have a question that I was unable to locate any information for a 10 >>> blade >>> aperture Rolleiflex TLR other than the 2.8C. >>> >>> I have a Rolleiflex MX-EVS Type 1 that has a round blade formation, >>> rather >>> the pentagon shape usually encountered. >>> >>> What information is available for the other than a 2.8C Rolleiflex? >>> >>> >>> Evan Dong >>> > --- > Rollei List > > - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' > in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with > 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org > > - Online, searchable archives are available at > //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list > > > --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list