[rollei_list] Re: No 220 film 2.8C and 220 film
- From: CarlosMFreaza <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:37:04 -0300
Yes Richard, thanks, I'll shoot the Tri X at the ISO 320 nominal speed
and I'll develop it with Microdol X full strength according the Kodak
Technical sheet instructions.
Carlos
2010/3/9 Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:16 PM
> Subject: [rollei_list] Re: No 220 film 2.8C and 220 film
>
>
>>> 2010/3/9 Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>>>
>>>> I can tell you hou will get full shadow detail at 320 probably with the
>>>> Microdol 1:3 as that gives you full film speed so you'll be probably be
>>>> over
>>>> exposing.
>>>> You might check out the curve of the film and see if you really want to
>>>> be
>>>> over exposing.
>>>
>>> Thank you Mark, I think you are right, a friend of mine sent me that
>>> suggestion but there is an error, I did not find the combo TXP ISO 200
>>> Microdol X 1:3 in the Kodak technical sheet or any other web site or
>>> forum. I'll use the film at ISO 320.
>>>
>>> Carlos
>>
>>
>> Oh they'll have it all right. The super geek chart- sombody. That does not
>> mean you'd want to use it.
>>
>> [Rabs]
>> Mark William Rabiner
>>
> The Kodak data sheet for both kinds of Tri-X gives times for both in full
> strength Microdol-X but only for the ISO-400 version in Microdol-X 1:3. No
> speed correction is given for the full strength development but a slight
> increase in exposure is usually desirable.
> At 1:3 there is no speed loss but its not recommended that the developer
> be used at temperatures under 75F. This probably counts for TXP as well.
> Since there is no advantage in grain for Microdol-X at 1:3 one might as well
> use D-76. The only advantage the diluted Microdol has is acutance and that
> is of relatively less importance for Rollei size negatives than 35mm
> negatives.
>
> --
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
> Rollei List
>
> - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the
> subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
>
> - Online, searchable archives are available at
> //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
>
>
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
