[rollei_list] Re: No 220 film 2.8C and 220 film
- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 18:29:33 -0800
----- Original Message -----
From: "CarlosMFreaza" <cmfreaza@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 5:37 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: No 220 film 2.8C and 220 film
Yes Richard, thanks, I'll shoot the Tri X at the ISO 320
nominal speed
and I'll develop it with Microdol X full strength according
the Kodak
Technical sheet instructions.
Carlos
Microdol-X and Perceptol, when used full strength, lose
about 3/4 stop of speed. This is within the latitude of the
film but you may get better shadow rendition by increasing
exposure a little. I would shoot it at around EI-250.
Tri-X 320 has low toe contrast so pushing the exposure
up the toe a little may be beneficial anyway.
PXP in full strength Microdol-X should be exceedingly
fine grain.
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
