[rollei_list] Re: No 220 film 2.8C and 220 film
- From: Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:14:34 -0500
> Jan:
> Using the 220 in the 'coerd IV I lost 1/2 frame obtaining 23
> 1/2 frames, since you open the camera after to shoot the frame 12 but
> before to advance the film, when you advance the film from "0" the
> camera starts measuring the frame you already took and since the film
> sensor in the upper spool chamber "knows" there is film enough to
> engage the frames counter you don't lose film too much. I'll see with
> the 2.8C now, perhaps I'll obtain the complete 24 frames 'cause I lost
> the 1/2 frame in the 'cord IV at the film start, the Rolleiflexes
> engage the frames counter at the exact film start.
> There no longer is manufactured 220 B&W film now, only color slides
> and color negatives films.
>
> Carlos
The Hewes reels in 220 are much more worth it even then the 35mm reels.
They really make it so you can run your own 220 with no problems.
And very efficient chemistry wise. I still ran xtol 1:3 with them no problem
by the way.
[Rabs]
Mark William Rabiner
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
