[rollei_list] Re: Lens Resolution Charts

  • From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:31:38 -0800


----- Original Message ----- From: "Marc James Small" <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 5:06 PM
Subject: [rollei_list] Lens Resolution Charts


National Bureau of Standards Special Publication
374,  METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE RESOLVING POWER
OF PHOTOGRAPHIC LENSES, is the Holy Grail for
such charts.  The Air Force chart is quite
adequate but these have been reproduced,
generation until generation, so the ones
available today are probably twenty or thirty
generation copies, with a loss of sharpness at every generation.

The NBS chart included in this Special
Publication is printed by the US Mint and is a first-generation product.

Marc


The USAF chart is available as a TIFF or high res JPEG on the net. A Google search found several sources. These can be printed out in any size. To test a lens using this chart really requires a group of charts arrayed over a flat surface. The resolution printed on the chart assumes a certain magnification (or rather reduction) so the ratio of the final image to the size of the chart must be known. The pattern of the modern chart is such as to avoid as much as possible "false resolution" but this must still be guarded against in interpreting results. The way is to count the number of bars; the number will be wrong where there is a false reading. By using an array of charts the variation in resolution with image angle can be seen. While there is a simple relationship between theoretical resolution and image anglebased on simple diffraction at an aperture it is affected by then nature of residual aberrations, the geometry of the image, and the "illumination" of the entrance window, any or all of which can change the distribution substantially from that of a simple aperture with zero thickness, which is what the charts show. There is also the issue of film flatness where the resolution is measured from a recorded image rather than from the aerial image. A test using the USAF 1951 chart can be quite meaningful but one must be aware of exactly what it is measuring and its limits (true of any measurement of anything).

--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: