[rollei_list] Re: 135 vs. 135
- From: Marc James Small <marcsmall@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:46:08 -0500
At 11:37 PM 11/16/2009, Elias Roustom wrote:
>> a greater data-catch on a Rolleiflex TLR than you do on, say, a
>> Rolleiflex SL35E.
>
>Because the negative size compensates for it?
>So it follows that the center 24x36 area of a TLR 6x6 negative is not
>necessarily sharper, or more data rich, than a 24x36 area from a micro
>format SLR?
Specific lenses vary but, in general, I believe
that, no, the central area of a MF lens is still
less capable of resolution than is a lens designed for miniature-format work.
Marc
msmall@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cha robh bàs fir gun ghràs fir!
---
Rollei List
- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
Other related posts:
