[rollei_list] Re: 135 vs. 135

  • From: Elias Roustom <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 22:33:29 -0500

Sounds like a plan! When the semester is over we'll have to arrange it.

E.

On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Eric Goldstein wrote:

You could compare the 80/2.8 Planar to the FD 85/1.2L. Or the 135/4
Sonnar to an FD 135. I have...


Eric Goldstein

--

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:55 PM,  <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
A brief discussion arose in the Pure Silver list about 135 film in MF
cameras (ie my Rolleiflex and Yashica).
I said I found that my TLRs do a better job on my 135 film than my Canon FD
lenses. I was asked what I based that on, as
(apparently) lenses made for 135 cameras resolve more lines than lenses for
120 cameras...
I found some supporting documents online for this, but I still think my
Rollie makes better 135 negatives than my Canons do.
Am I imagining the sharpness and contrast improvement? Am I the only
Rolleikin user who thinks this?

Even if it's true, I don't really care. I'm fond of the TLR method, and the
results suit me just fine, but I'm curious.

If I run a test, do I compare my 80mm Planar with my 100mm FD lens?

Elias


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe'
in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list


---
Rollei List

- Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org

- Online, searchable archives are available at
//www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list

Other related posts: