Sounds like a plan! When the semester is over we'll have to arrange it. E. On Nov 16, 2009, at 9:58 PM, Eric Goldstein wrote:
You could compare the 80/2.8 Planar to the FD 85/1.2L. Or the 135/4 Sonnar to an FD 135. I have... Eric Goldstein -- On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:55 PM, <eroustom@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:A brief discussion arose in the Pure Silver list about 135 film in MF cameras (ie my Rolleiflex and Yashica).I said I found that my TLRs do a better job on my 135 film than my Canon FDlenses. I was asked what I based that on, as(apparently) lenses made for 135 cameras resolve more lines than lenses for120 cameras...I found some supporting documents online for this, but I still think myRollie makes better 135 negatives than my Canons do. Am I imagining the sharpness and contrast improvement? Am I the only Rolleikin user who thinks this?Even if it's true, I don't really care. I'm fond of the TLR method, and theresults suit me just fine, but I'm curious. If I run a test, do I compare my 80mm Planar with my 100mm FD lens? Elias--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list
--- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx- Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org
- Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list