bradley;more power to you.the 330 is my all time best rodgers organ.my parent'S church has one,though not enough speakers on it.only 2 channels and antiphonal.it's a 6 channel organ.do you have any tapes of you playing on it?i'd like to hear it.you're right about proper speakers. milt miller > > Ralph, > > No, I'm serious as a train wreck. A Rodgers 330 > (or similar Rodgers analog) is my preference, provided > it is properly voiced and installed. It is the > digitals that sound artificial to me. I believe it's > all in the ears. > I have removed, installed, voiced, tuned, played, > and even owned a number of pipe organs of various > style and make since 1973. I was one of the guys that > stuck my nose in the air at "those dreadful electronic > appliances". That was until I heard a propery voiced > and installed electronic organ, which just happened to > be an analog Rodgers theatre organ. > I purchased my 330E, spent the money for an audio > system that does the instrument justice, and have > never looked back. I hear various pipe and electronic > organs in various installations all the time, and > there are few I would trade my Rodgers 330E > for. I will state again that the key here is "PROPER > VOICING AND INSTALLATION, and that means you need an > audio system that is capable. > Just my $0.02 worth. > > Best regards, > Brad Starcevich > > --- Ralph Cullen <rcullen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > At 08:44 AM 11/18/2003 -0800, you wrote: > > > > > > >I have a Rodgers 330E drawknob organ in my home. I > > >can state unequivically that I could blind fold > > ANYONE > > >without prior knowledge of the installation and, > > after > > >playing it, challenge them whether the organ is > > pipes, > > >analog, or digital. I can guarantee that few, if > > any, > > >would guess analog or digital. > > > > I haven't contributed to this discussion, and am > > rather reluctant, but.... > > you surely have to be joking Bradley.... > > I have to say without mentioning any brands, that > > Rodgers Analogue organs > > were certainly the most wonderful electronic organs > > in their day, and > > certainly better than the "Computer Organ" (of > > similar vintage to the > > Rodgers LTG organs) I played recently for a service > > in another church. > > However: The very nature of the tone generation > > system and unit keying > > demanded that the mixtures were all out of tune, and > > very harsh as a > > result. As well as that, the sterility associated, > > not with ENSEMBLE (for > > it was the best) but with tonal colour made the > > organs of that time sound > > very blah, as comparted with properly tuned and > > voiced PDI technology. > > There is no doubt that they were fine organs, but > > compared to pipes?????? > > Cheers, > > Ralph Rodgers fan from the early seventies. > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe or set to vacation, > > go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html > > If you have any difficulty with this or PayPal, > > please contact noeljones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for help! > > > > Shop for Playing Guides to your Rodgers Organ at > > Frog Music Press > > > > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard > http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree > ____________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or set to vacation, > go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html > If you have any difficulty with this or PayPal, > please contact noeljones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for help! > > Shop for Playing Guides to your Rodgers Organ at Frog Music Press > > ____________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or set to vacation, go to www.frogmusic.com/rodgersmem.html If you have any difficulty with this or PayPal, please contact noeljones@xxxxxxxxxxxxx for help! Shop for Playing Guides to your Rodgers Organ at Frog Music Press