[pure-silver] Re: [inconsistent results with TXP
- From: Shannon Stoney <sstoney@xxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 13:39:14 -0500
<quote who=Shannon Stoney [date=10/13/2005 11:56]/>
1) maybe the film I used over the summer was old. I can't remember
if I used some that had been stored for a while or what. If the
film was a year or so old, would that make it less responsive to
exposure and development?
2) Maybe if film sits around waiting to be processed for several
months, it loses responsiveness to chemistry? (I have not found
this to be particularly true in the past however.)
3) Maybe I consistently metered wrong, or the meter was messed up.
But I just had the meter checked and it was fine. Also it was fine
when I used it for the batch of film I shot and processed last week.
4) You didn't process the film long enough.
Are you 100% sure that you developed it long enough? Did you
deviate at all from how you have normally developed this film?
I used the same method to calculate development times in both
batches. The film bought locally, developed immediately, worked
perfectly with this method. The film shot during the summer, no
telling how old the film was, and developed 3-5 months later, did
not. So I don't think it's my development time figuring.
--shannon
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
