[pure-silver] Re: [inconsistent results with TXP

  • From: "Eric Neilsen Photography" <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:56:24 -0500

I haven't read every word in the thread, so bare with me. Do you use
distilled water? And you only process in Houston? 

 

It seems like you have a peckle of problems or potential problems. Had any
of this shown up before? 

 

I have not worked with the BZ.. Tubes, so do they turn at a constant rate?
And you have checked it lately for constant rate? 

 

The reciprocity failure has been ruled out on both films? You say several
seconds, what kind of light source? Daylight? street light?  

 

I'd make sure your developer is OK by using fresh film in daylight
conditions; shoot and develop to 18% gray. Then move on to scenic that is
same as before with fresh developer and working light meter. 

 

 

 

 

Eric Neilsen Photography

4101 Commerce Street, Suite 9

Dallas, TX 75226

214-827-8301

http://ericneilsenphotography.com

  _____  

From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Shannon Stoney
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 5:23 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: [inconsistent results with TXP

 

What time of the year was it when developing both films? I'm trying to find
out if developing temperature could have made a difference, but I didn't get
an answer to my first question.

 

I did them both within a few days of each other, just this week. It's still
summer in Houston. It's summer all the time here, except for a few days in
january.  I develop at 70 degrees.

 

--shannon

 






Regards



Ralph W. Lambrecht

 <http://www.darkroomagic.com> http://www.darkroomagic.com







On 2005-10-14 18:22, "Chuck ." <speedgraphic@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I used the same method to calculate development times in both batches.
The
> film bought locally, developed immediately, worked perfectly with this
> method. The film shot during the summer, no telling how old the film was,
> and developed 3-5 months later, did not.  So I don't think it's my
> development time figuring.
>
> --shannon
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Shannon,
>
> What is the basis for your development times?
> When in doubt I usually go to Digitaltruth.com and use their "massive
> development chart" as a starting point.
>
> Speedy
>
>
>
============================================================================
==
> ===============================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,)
> and unsubscribe from there.

 

Other related posts: