[pure-silver] Re: T-Max 400 2
- From: Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 14:22:37 -0700 (PDT)
Sounds realistic to me.
I was more concerned about the change in development
times which, in the case of my client's film today,
seems to still be too much although I haven't seen it
dry yet. I'm sure it was overexposed so I'll be
adjusting on the next batch today. Original TMY was
9.5-10 mins and today I ran at 8.
I've always cut back from Kodak's rec. times when it
came to T-max (as I did today slightly) until the
previous versions coming from the new manufacturing
facility put the times pretty much spot on.
Today's results look like almost another minute needs
to come off the time using T-Max 1:7.
Eric
--- Dennis Purdy <dlp4777@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This happened a couple months ago and I read the
> glowing test reports
> and bought a bunch of the new 120 stuff early in
> Feb. I have gotten
> into arguments about this to the point that I don't
> really want to do
> it again but what I found in many side by side tests
> shooting the exact
> same subject at the same time with the same camera
> and processing them
> together that this is really much ado about
nothing...........
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total
Access, No Cost.
http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
