[pure-silver] Re: Speaking of film...
- From: Dana Myers <dana.myers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 08:55:52 -0700
On 7/18/2018 8:43 AM, Richard Lahrson wrote:
Also, the SLR covers more of the photographer's face than a rangefinder.
Your subject can see YOUR expression.
Exactly. I was going to suggest that a TLR (or, more generally, waist-level
finder) eliminates the 'wall' between the photography and subject that
an SLR can be. Perhaps it makes the experience less "clinical"...
TLRs are quieter than SLRs,
and if the camera is hanging from the neck, you're looking down at the image
it's hard to tell when the picture is taken. However, nowadays, the TLR
itself attracts a lot of attention because most don't know it.
All true. In particular, a TLR will generally look 'vintage' and perhaps
touch a sense of sentimentality in the subject (and possibly the photographer).
But, I'm diving into details here. Myron's point is a very good one.
Cheers,
Dana K6JQ
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
