Yes Kodagraph was used in the printing industry usually to make halftone images. Used with dot matrix screens and a point light source. It will develop in any paper developer. The rough texture was to prevent Newton rings because negatives / screens were placed in contact with the paper. I don't have any sensit. properties any more. But I expect it to be very high contrast. If you intend to use it for pictorial imagery you may want to use a low contrast developer. It was the late '70's that I worked with those papers. Dave. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 12:35 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Old Kodak Projection paper : > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Barrie Bunning" <barrieb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, January 28, 2005 11:07 AM > Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Old Kodak Projection paper : > > > > Greetings all; > > I have a few questions for the group :- > > I have recently come buy 2 unopened packets of ' > > Kodak Kodagraph PRQ5 projection paper, it says on the > > label one of a > > range of Kodak Document materials. It is Rough single > > weight, use Wratten > > series OB safelight, made in England. > > Q1. What color is Wratten OB ? > > Q2. What developer to use. > > Q3. What was the 'Original purpose' of this paper. > > I have opened up one packet, in the dark, and my standard > > safelight seems > > OK, the paper has a really rough texture, is reasonably > > slow to enlarge > > with but seems to be similar to Grade 2. My test > > images are lovely, but > > the paper is really thin and the base color is a little > > pinkish, but nice. > > I have yet to try toning. Any Info would be greatly > > appreciated as I have > > 98 sheets of 20" x 16" paper that seems to be in > > excellent condition for > > its age ? . > > Cheers Barrie B. > > > The OB was the old standard Kodak filter for graded paper. > The OC has more a more limited spectrum. It is suitable for > any paper which is "safe" with the OB filter but the OB > filter should not be used for papers specifying an OC filter > such as modern variable contrast filters. > I think Kodagraph was a document copying paper, Dave Valvo > will know. > > --- > Richard Knoppow > Los Angeles, CA, USA > dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ============================================================================ ================================= > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. > ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.