[procps] Re: procps-ng for Translation Project
- From: Craig Small <csmall@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Benno Schulenberg <coordinator@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 28 Dec 2013 09:37:40 +1100
On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 04:25:46PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
> whereas I would like to see it gettextized like this:
>
> _("--foo this is an option")
> _("-bar this is the other one")
Hello Benno,
I realised I dropped the ball here and didn't split up the help
text for you. It was only when someone said "where's the
translations"[1] that I noticed something was missing.
The latest commit[2] has them sliced up now. Let me know if that's good
enough for translating. If so, we can start to load in the translations.
> >> "-L without -F makes no sense\n"
> >> "Try `%s --help' for more information."
> A define is a nice way of making sure that the text is always the
> same, but the essential part is that the two lines get a separate
> call of gettext() each.
I couldn't split these as they are used in a function call. It's
something like printf("text %s", program_name) where you can call
printf once only.
- Craig
[1] //www.freelists.org/post/procps/Translations,12
[2]
https://gitorious.org/procps/procps/commit/8a38cd5eb449c47450e31aa093635e8cfaaf2f73
--
Craig Small (@smallsees) http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
Other related posts:
