Judith, Many graphics designers have made the switch over to LCDs, so I have to assume it becomes more a matter of personal opinion/taste. CRTs are 'warmer' looking than LCDs (similar to the way vinyl sounds 'warmer' than compact disks) and will often 'color' the work in progress. If you've ever printed out a color image and found that the colors don't quite match what you see on a CRT screen, you'll understand what I mean by that. If your audience is going to view your work in print on paper, an LCD may be your best bet for accuracy. The main thing you need to look for is the monitor's default resolution and the spacing between pixels, especially if you often zoom into an image to do manual touchups. Before taking anything I have said here as gospel, head over to some graphics oriented forums and see what the experts there have to say about this topic. They are in a much better position than I to provide real world insight. My statements are purely theory and conjecture since I am not, in fact, a well practiced graphics artist (at least not yet). :O) Peace, GMan "The only dumb questions are the ones that are never asked!" ----- Original Message ----- From: "Judith/agoodread.com" <jtb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, June 23, 2007 12:04 PM Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- LCD vs CRT Monitors > OK, I do a lot of digital art and from what I've read, a CRT is > better for this. Does this still hold true? > > Judith -- Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. To unsubscribe or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/