Hank, Didn't know how your software would understand the AIEEE. I was just putting for Hank like GMan put smiles for Hank. Jo Ann -------Original Message------- From: hank smith Date: 02/22/07 16:46:27 To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Jo Ann's New system - Dept. of RAM why you screaming for me? anything wrong? 73 hank smith amateur radio call sign: KE7IEF echo link node: 301027 email: hanksmith4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx msn messenger: hanksmith5@xxxxxxxxxxx aim: hanksmith5 skype: hanksmith5 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jo Ann Weaver" <bookworm54@xxxxxxx> To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:57 AM Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Jo Ann's New system - Dept. of RAM > AIEEE! (Screaming for Hank) > > Now that I've got that out of my system, if it's possible I'd like to have > my new baby up and running by my birthday ( March 13th) if it's possible. > Ain't computers both wonderful and extremely aggravating? > > Jo Ann > > -------Original Message------- > > From: GMan > Date: 02/22/07 02:33:18 > To: pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Jo Ann's New system - Dept. of RAM > > Good Morning, Jo Ann, (assumption? perhaps) > > Ok, I just ran across an unbiased review of the board (AnandTech) and it > is, > in fact, a known problem with the board's tightly set timings and not with > the RAM. This issue affects more than just this particular board, too. > ASUS is currently working on an updated BIOS that corrects the problem. > This basically means there's nothing wrong with the OCZ we've been > discussing and, as I suspected, it comes down to the board makers trying > to > be the best performers and setting their timings too tight. > > Alright, as a result of the above revelation, we've now got to talk about > mainboard revisions. When a mobo maker releases a board, it normally > comes > with the first stable BIOS they designed for it already installed. When > they update the BIOS, they make it available on the internet for owners of > that board to download and flash. If they're still manufacturing that > board, they drop the original BIOS and use the newer one instead. To > differentiate between the older and newer boards, they use a revision > number. Subsequent BIOS updates will coincide with higher revision > numbers > until they eventually stop producing that particular mainboard. They may > or > may not continue to produce newer BIOS updates once the board is no longer > manufactured. > > Having said all that, you're going to want to buy this board with the new > BIOS already installed because there's no way for you to flash the BIOS > without having installed the RAM already. It's one of those catch-22s > unless you get the newest revision. Of course, this means you'll have to > hold off on the board until it's available with this new BIOS AND you'll > have to specifically ask for this revision, since stores online & off will > still have some of the older stock they're trying to unload. This > AnandTech > review I'm reading is dated Dec 22nd of 2006, so the new revision may > already be available. I'll let you know what I find. > > Peace, > GMan > > " > > > -- > <Please delete this line and everything below.> > > To unsub or change your email settings: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > > To access our Archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > -- <Please delete this line and everything below.> To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ -- <Please delete this line and everything below.> To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/