On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 15:56:11 -0500, geekette wrote: "However, that said: . . .a C++ programmer friend, who is still employed and wishes to remain annonymous, said that he doesn't disapprove of stealing software because of just the opposite of MNL's statement.[No offense intended, he said, MNL]. It --is-- the company you are ripping off because they are paying the programmers in foreign lands a pitance no matter how much the company makes selling the software. By putting the bottom line ahead of workers' rights and needs they put American programmers out of work and contribute to the poverty status in other lands. [It wasn't just the dot com bust that raised the unemployment rate among programmers.]" I've heard this kind of argument before and it's simply smoke and mirrors!! When someone steals a product...someone else pays the price. There is no such thing as "ripping off the company" -- those companies exist because they make money. If the majority of people steal their product they have three choices, they raise their prices to cover the losses, lay off employees to cut costs to make up for the losses, or they can go out of business. If they raise their prices, guess who pays for it!? YOU and I do!! When you and I buy Win XP for $200+, I KNOW a good part of that money pays for the danged software that's stolen. If not, the company, no matter how good the product they make is.....will go out of business. Does your friend think it's fair that all of us who pay for their software should also pay to cover the cost of the software that your friend steals?? If they lay people off......it's people like you and I! Is that fair?? Additionally, most of these companies exist because they sell stock to finance the growth of the company. Each of you who own stock, or mutual funds, lose value in your stock when theft exists......who else pays for it?? Profits go down because of theft -- that's a fact, or else the price of the product goes up to cover the cost of theft ---- theft is not a victimless crime -- it has a consequence. Finally, the comment that "they are paying the programmers in foreign lands a pittance no matter how much the company makes selling the software. By putting the bottom line ahead of workers' rights and needs they put American programmers out of work and contribute to the poverty status in other lands" is, IMHO, simply BS!! How can anyone argue that paying companies in India, China, etc., to do programming contributes to the level of poverty in those countries. That argument is so silly it needs no response. Now group, we have a problem here......and I suppose I'm responsible for it as I responded quickly and firmly (and hopefully with respect for the original poster though I strongly disagree with his thoughts). This topic isn't exactly on topic, though certainly relevant to software and computers. If the majority find it of interest......we can entertain other opinions. If not, we can agree to disagree and drop the topic <chuckle> The last thing I want to do is make anyone feel intimidated or insulted. I particularly respect the fact that we have members on this list from many countries, and I do not want to offend them. Regards from the "Keyboard Cowboy", Master NetLord ,,,,, Ô¿Ô¬ Cincinnati, Ohio Scottsdale, Arizona «::::»¤«::::»¤¤«::::»¤«::::» Friday 07/12/2002 10:45:56 PM To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/