Possibly the manager can approve use of Apex.
Airport Ownership and Management from official FAA records
Ownership: Privately-owned
Owner: APEX PROPERTY OWNERS, INC.
PO BOX 1659
SILVERDALE, WA 98383
Phone (360) 981-5457
ALT MGR WAYNE SARGENT AT 206-390-4131 AND HAL DOWNES AT 360-698-1564.
Manager: SCOTT WOODBURY
13885 CRESTVIEW CIRCLE NW
SILVERDALE, WA 98383
Phone (360) 981-5457
Sent from EKAJDYOB
On Sep 17, 2019, at 16:55, <ORCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <ORCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey, if your Apprentice did take out one of the fir trees, I’ll volunteer my
Apprentice to take out the other fir.<wlEmoticon-winkingsmile[1].png>
Rick
From: Tom Speer
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2019 3:25 PM
To: orcachat@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [orcachat] Re: Lifting contest
Home Depot has steel bars that are 1/8" thick. I'm thinking they could be
applied with double-sided tape.
With steel joiners and steel bars on the wing, maybe it really could take on
that fir tree!
Cheers,
Tom
On 9/17/19 12:04 PM, Jake Boyd wrote:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ujuxIv5UBiE&time_continue=208
Sent from EKAJDYOB
On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:45, Jake Boyd <dyob42@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Agreed.....wheels could be used for added weight but will need counter
ballast since they will be either forward or aft of CG depending on nose or
tail wheel. Fairings good for weight.
Flat sheet lead could cover part of center section.
<image1.png>
Sent from EKAJDYOB
On Sep 17, 2019, at 11:26, Tom Speer <me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, larger diameter wheels would help. I'm thinking they could be housed
in Northrop Gamma style fairings. The wheels could be heavy and the
fairings hold ballast, too.
Based on the 4+ lb gross weight that's flown with the stock wing (from a
paved runway), I'm thinking we may be looking at a 10+ lb plane. I'm
starting to wonder where we can put all that weight.
Cheers,
Tom
On 9/17/19 11:14 AM, Jake Boyd wrote:
Perhaps very low drag but large diameter wheels would help 8” to 10”
diameter perhaps.
Any thoughts?
Jake
Sent from EKAJDYOB
On Sep 17, 2019, at 10:52, Tom Speer <me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In this case, I'm more concerned with takeoff than landing. I don't
think we can get a heavily loaded Mini-Apprentice to take off on our
grass runway. It is hard enough as it is to get the plane to roll at
its light weight. I'm also concerned that, even with the east alders
removed, we won't have a clear path to depart after takeoff. But
rolling is the biggest problem.
I see two solutions. One is to go to another venue to make the loaded
flights. I've not been to the Chimicum field, yet, but while I've heard
it is windy there, they may have a smoother runway and more open flying
area. There are probably other fields in the area that have paved or
geotextile surfaces.
The other solution is to put down a smoother surface on our runway. We
decided not to go with a geotextile surface because of the cost, but I
am going to look at Home Depot to see what they might have in way of a
cheaper alternative. We don't need something that will last, and we
don't need it to be wide enough to land on. It just needs to be
something we can put down for loaded takeoffs and then pack up at the
end of the day.
Cheers,
Tom
On 9/16/19 4:41 PM, Thomas Condon wrote:
Tom,
Don't have runway envy. Tarmac runways do much more damage on a rough
landing than grass!
The Other Tom!
On Sep 16, 2019, at 12:40 PM, Tom Speer <me@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have runway envy!
It's clear we will need provision for a lot more weight than will fit
inside the wing. Probably a ballast box like they have, and maybe
some ballast boxes out on the wings, too. I'm thinking Northrop Gamma
style wheel pants that come down from where the tail booms mount.
Cheers,
Tom
On 9/16/19 12:18 PM, Paul Below (Redacted sender paulbelow for DMARC)
wrote:
https://www.facebook.com/564421820361041/posts/1622695037867042/?sfnsn=mo
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
