RE: OMS and Repository Preferences
- From: Michael Dinh <mdinh@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:06:51 -0700
From my understanding, there is no license needed to for database supporting
Oracle Infrastructure.
Hence, OEM repository database (no license needed) and it would makes sense to
include primary and standby should DG be leveraged.
I am not going to touch RAC part because I am clueless there.
Michael Dinh
Disparity Breaks Automation (DBA)
Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong -
Peter T Mcintyre
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss
people - Eleanor Roosevelt
When any rule or formula becomes a substitute for thought rather than an aid to
thinking, it is dangerous and should be discarded -Thomas William Phelps
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Tim Hall
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 12:46 PM
To: Hans Forbrich
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
OK. To revise my statement...
It is my understanding that DG is only allowed as an option on a fully
licensed EE database. If you want the OMR protected using DG you have
to pay full whack for the EE licenses.
I would be very happy to be proved wrong. :)
Of course, as with any Oracle licensing issue, the only way to be sure it
to get about 16 independent quotes and compare them, factoring in the
over-licensing suggested by the sales people in an attempt to get the
new Porsche a bit quicker. :)
Cheers
Tim...
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
