Regarding the versions, are you referring to "Toad for Oracle" and "Toad for
Oracle Professional"?
In the version I tested there are lists of all schemas in the database, and
their associated objects. How would this look if the developer does not have
the required priviledges? (Would they receive an error that they can't
select from dba_objects? etc.?)
Thanks for the input!
From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx> To: <fred_fred_1@xxxxxxxxxxx>,<oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: RE: Managing developers recommendations Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 16:39:02 -0400
Fred,
Your developers don't need the DBA version of TOAD. What they need is the basic TOAD. And besides even if they do have the DBA version, without the necessary database level permissions they can't do anything destructive.
-----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fred Smith Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 4:30 PM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Managing developers recommendations
Hi all, My developers (who currently just use SQL Plus) now are wanting to use
Quest TOAD. From what I've used it in the past, it is far too powerful for developers. (I don't trust my developers with creating tablespaces, etc.). Plus, I've found that TOAD is far too easy to delete objects, etc. Any recommendations, etc would greatly be appreciated! -Fred S.
_________________________________________________________________ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
-- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
-- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
