Re: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
- From: Rodd Holman <Rodd.Holman@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Rich.Jesse@xxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 13:11:12 -0500
That's what happens if you let Oracle's OUI setup your database for you.
I always go in and modify the file parameters before I let it write any
scripts or do anything for me. Seems like Oracle is modifying the OFA.
Can't say I'm surprised.
Also THANK YOU!! Cary. I knew I'd seen somewhere that they were
supposed to be separate.
Rodd
oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Excellent! Coming from you, it's worth *tons*. I'm glad you replied,
> Cary, and I'm glad to finally see the de facto OFA paper.
>
> Now I just need to figure out where I've seen the "oradata" directory
> slapped under ORACLE_BASE or ORACLE_HOME.
>
> Thanks!
> Rich
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cary Millsap [mailto:cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:51 PM
> To: Jesse, Rich; stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx; jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
>
> I would agree that .log is a dangerous extension for files that you want
> *not* to get picked off by some SA's "find" command for deletion.
>
> And the OFA spec definitely does NOT put data files beneath ORACLE_BASE
> or ORACLE_HOME (http://www.hotsos.com/e-library/abstract.php?id=19).
>
> So I agree with you on both accounts.
>
> For what it's worth.
>
>
> Cary Millsap
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
