RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
- To: "Cary Millsap" <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx>, <stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx>, <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 12:59:11 -0500
Excellent! Coming from you, it's worth *tons*. I'm glad you replied,
Cary, and I'm glad to finally see the de facto OFA paper.
Now I just need to figure out where I've seen the "oradata" directory
slapped under ORACLE_BASE or ORACLE_HOME.
Thanks!
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Cary Millsap [mailto:cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 12:51 PM
To: Jesse, Rich; stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx; jkstill@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Inheriting a "interesting" recovery process
I would agree that .log is a dangerous extension for files that you want
*not* to get picked off by some SA's "find" command for deletion.
And the OFA spec definitely does NOT put data files beneath ORACLE_BASE
or ORACLE_HOME (http://www.hotsos.com/e-library/abstract.php?id=19).
So I agree with you on both accounts.
For what it's worth.
Cary Millsap
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
