Re: Considerations to choose SUN server for Oracle
- From: przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:54:07 +0200
1. I can't find this bug (Sunsolve/bugs.opensolrais.org). Any link ?
2. You can find bugs on every platform - including Nehalem, Power7, Sparc VII,
Itanium etc.
3. I would not paint T2000 and T5240/T5440 with the same brush - their name
starts
with "T" ;-) but they are quite different.
Regards
Przemek
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:38:40AM +0200, Martin Berger wrote:
> Even I argued quite different in the old thread, I must recommend to
> stay away from T-series.
> We have an open prio1 SR (started 12-May-2010 !) - Solaris and Oracle
> development is involved, but still no resolution. (Communication is
> complex in such an issue, but I'd say, they still does not know what's
> going wrong)
> if someone wants to track it check for Bug:9714309.
> As it's still open I cannot tell the root cause or fix, but it's
> something about authentication in cssd - I could reproduce it with CRS
> stack or 'single node' (just ASM and RDBMS). everything in 11.1.0.7 -
> latest PSUs.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 22:09, Allen, Brandon <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> > I?d recommend staying away from Sun?s T-series servers ? see MOS document
> > 781763.1 and this earlier discussion for more details:
> >
> >
> > //www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Oracle-Performance-on-Sunfire-T2000,1
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
-------------------------------------
SpadĹ?y ceny mieszkaĹ? w Twoim regionie. SprawdĹş ofertÄ?!
http://linkint.pl/f27dd
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
