Re: Considerations to choose SUN server for Oracle
- From: Dennis Williams <oracledba.williams@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:01:34 -0500
I second that experience.
Since we have some applications that require the SPARC architecture, we've
had good luck so far with the Sun M series.
Dennis Williams
2010/8/27 <przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx>
> The first line of T-series servers (T2000) indeed was a disaster for Oracle
> workload.
> But the next line: T5240, T5440 was much better. If you have many parallel
> tasks (typical OLTP workload)
> T* they can be much,much faster then your E25K. But if you have rather
> batch-like tasks (single process)
> their performance is not so good ...
>
> Regards
> Przemek
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Allen, Brandon wrote:
> > I'd recommend staying away from Sun's T-series servers - see MOS document
> 781763.1 and this earlier discussion for more details:
> >
> >
> //www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Oracle-Performance-on-Sunfire-T2000,1
> >
> > Regards,
> > Brandon
> >
> >
> > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Denis
> >
> > I am wondering what type of Sun Server we can consider? T5440 or E25K
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
> attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
> consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions
> and other information in this message that do not relate to the official
> business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed
> by it.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Wez kredyt przez internet. Atrakcyjne oprocentowanie, bez zaswiadczen!
> http://linkint.pl/f27d6
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
Other related posts:
