Re: Considerations to choose SUN server for Oracle
- From: przemolicc@xxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:14:13 +0200
The first line of T-series servers (T2000) indeed was a disaster for Oracle
workload.
But the next line: T5240, T5440 was much better. If you have many parallel
tasks (typical OLTP workload)
T* they can be much,much faster then your E25K. But if you have rather
batch-like tasks (single process)
their performance is not so good ...
Regards
Przemek
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 01:09:05PM -0700, Allen, Brandon wrote:
> I'd recommend staying away from Sun's T-series servers - see MOS document
> 781763.1 and this earlier discussion for more details:
>
> //www.freelists.org/post/oracle-l/Oracle-Performance-on-Sunfire-T2000,1
>
> Regards,
> Brandon
>
>
> From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Denis
>
> I am wondering what type of Sun Server we can consider? T5440 or E25K
>
>
> ________________________________
> Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
> attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
> consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions
> and other information in this message that do not relate to the official
> business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by
> it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Wez kredyt przez internet. Atrakcyjne oprocentowanie, bez zaswiadczen!
http://linkint.pl/f27d6
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
