RE: ASM - hardware mirroring vs. Oracle mirroring
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>, "Finn Jorgensen" <finn.oracledba@xxxxxxxxx>, <krish.hariharan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Don Seiler" <don@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:56:32 -0700
I have no experience with ASM, nor any volume management software, but
my guess would be that ASM doesn't add complexity, rather it shifts that
area of complexity from the Unix admin to the DBA. I have the luxury of
working with an excellent team of Unix admins, so I prefer to let them
handle that area, but for someone who wears both the Unix/Linux admin
and the DBA hats, maybe it makes sense to use ASM. Can anyone else who
has worked extensively with both LVM and ASM confirm or deny that
assertion?
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Is it just me, or does ASM unnecessarily complicate operations?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
Other related posts:
