This is fun to agree with. :-) The only thing worse is to read 'incorrect' information in a book attempting to simulate RTFM and CTNOM. The 10g new features by Robert is great, and thanks to Jonathan and Pete, et al, for some serious good info. Regards, Mike Thomas (PS: Not to mention 'incorrect' RTFM and 'incorrect CTNOM) --- Mogens_Nørgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: In general, and to me, the RTFM and CTNOM (Check This Note On Metalink) are becoming increasingly rediculous (spelling?!?) to use against fellow citizens of the Oracle universe. Allow me to elaborate: __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------