[optimal] Re: Workload Demands
- From: "Hackel, Richard" <rhackel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 15:51:21 +0000
Check out this article in yesterday's New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/25/us/death-and-disarray-at-americas-racetracks.html?scp=1&sq=race%20horses&st=cse
Richard
________________________________
From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of
Marshall E Tyler [marshalletyler@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 8:34 AM
To: Anton Drew; optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Re: [optimal] Re: Workload Demands
Like Anton, except for being in a 3 photographer, 2 location practice, the
patient & procedure load kept increasing.
IF equipment were to never go down, and nobody was sick or on holiday, and
there were no OR cases, publication images, or drug studies, and no lunchs to
be eaten, nor potty needs, then all was good.
Days with 2 photographers could keep up with 100+ procedures. Days with one
photographer and 85+ procedures and 10 hour days were not uncommon.
There is an expression about abusing race horses: "Run hard and put up wet."
There is a point where not only photographers are abused, but patients receive
sub-par studies.
How to address this balance of appropriate staffing could be a topic for OPS
meetings.
Thank you,
Marshall
Marshall E. Tyler, CRA, FOPS, 40 years of service, Retired!
via Verizon Android Phone
----- Reply message -----
From: "Anton Drew" <anton.drew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, Mar 26, 2012 3:29 am
Subject: [optimal] Re: Workload Demands
To: <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Each year for the past 2 years our OCT workload had increased over 100% each
year and our patients were sent to Alan Hoare as we didn't have an OCT.
Since we got our own unit, nearly 2 years ago, our workload (on demand) had
increased 150% the first year, and 250%, last year.
Already we are ahead of that figure this year to the same time.
Being mainly a one man band it is getting very difficult to keep up with the
workloads for the Retinal Clinics which are 3 days a week, plus Diabetic
Screening.
With Fundal Photos, FFAs, Slitlamp Photography, OCTs, Pentacam and Wavefront
scans it is not unusual for me to have 28+ patients in a 3 hour session.
THEN they ask for images for publications, editing of videos taken during
surgery, and forms, brochures and posters designed.
Getting too old for this stress. :o|
After 40 years in the job (started 14th Feb 1972), enough is enough, as they
won't employ my assistant full time, I am making a concerted effort to cut my
hours back in transition to retirement, but I am getting a lot of resistance to
that.
The job has become too stressful trying to keep up with the present and
increasing workload and there doesn't seem to be any relief in sight.
I regularly work up to an hour over and above my Award hours, but don't get
paid any extra, and have no chance of taking the time off at a later date.
So Lisa, as they say, "ALL of the above!"
Anton
On 26/03/2012, at 1:03 PM, Lisa Breayley wrote:
Quick question for those of you who went from a paper/print system for results
to a totally on-line system – i.e. Drs can see patient results “instantly” in
clinic.
Did your workload go up? Did having results straight away meant the clinicians
asked for more? More patients? More tests? More views?
We’re looking at a system now and I’m curious…
Lisa
L.M.Breayley
Senior Photographer
MedPIC
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
32 Gisborne Street
East Melbourne, Victoria 3002
Ph 61-3-9929 8335
Fax 61-3-9929 8217
www.eyeandear.org.au<http://www.eyeandear.org.au>
______________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information in this e-mail message may be confidential, and may also be
subject to legal privilege, public interest or legal professional privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this
e-mail is unauthorised.
If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the
presence of computer viruses.
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital however does not warrant the message
is free of viruses.
It is recommended as a prudent business practice the recipient perform a virus
scan of any message received.
______________________________________________________________________
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be
used for urgent or sensitive issues
Other related posts:
