[optimal] Re: Workload Demands
- From: "Breit, Peter" <BreitP@xxxxxxxx>
- To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 11:30:05 -0400
In general, moving from prints to electronic charts is just a bit faster. Of
course if one happens to type in the wrong patient number add several minutes
to delete pictures on patient record and then save again on the correct patient
record.
Plus some data bases are more friendly to us adding pictures, OCT, HRT,
Octopus, etc. others require several steps which then takes longer then just
providing a paper print.
It helps if the photographer gets involved in the whole changing over to EMR
process.
These comments are from my private praxis experience. My hospital has not
switched me to EMR yet.
Thank you
Peter
Peter L. Breit, CRA.
Director Ophthalmic Services
The Lankenau Hospital & Bryn Mawr Hospital
484-476-3338
484-476-8206 fax
484-437-3262 mobile
page 3707
________________________________
From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Lisa Breayley
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:34 PM
To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [optimal] Workload Demands
Quick question for those of you who went from a paper/print system for results
to a totally on-line system – i.e. Drs can see patient results “instantly” in
clinic.
Did your workload go up? Did having results straight away meant the clinicians
asked for more? More patients? More tests? More views?
We’re looking at a system now and I’m curious…
Lisa
L.M.Breayley
Senior Photographer
MedPIC
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital
32 Gisborne Street
East Melbourne, Victoria 3002
Ph 61-3-9929 8335
Fax 61-3-9929 8217
www.eyeandear.org.au<http://www.eyeandear.org.au>
______________________________________________________________________
Attention:
The information in this e-mail message may be confidential, and may also be
subject to legal privilege, public interest or legal professional privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this
e-mail is unauthorised.
If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender.
This footnote also confirms that this email message has been checked for the
presence of computer viruses.
The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital however does not warrant the message
is free of viruses.
It is recommended as a prudent business practice the recipient perform a virus
scan of any message received.
______________________________________________________________________
Other related posts:
