Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Take a look at the MPEG-LA web site Bert. > > http://www.mpegla.com They have a handy dandy summary, which says $2.50 per consumer device, even if it also records. It was $6.00 before 1 January 2002. http://www.mpegla.com/m2/m2web_licenseterms.ppt But, finding it hard to believe that the ATSC demod would cost over $20 in royalties, I found this interesting post from Frank Eory, from 2004. That's where he guesstimated $5.00 for the 8-VSB demod, but it's also where he lists other IP that might incur fees in DTV sets. So again, unless I'm missing something major, I do not see why there would be a very significant difference between DVB-T and ATSC royalty payments, unless all those other royalty costs Frank mentions disappear very soon. If the Chinese article was accurate when it said $23 for an ATSC receiver, what is the total $ figure applicable to a DVB-T receiver? Why is that never made to be an issue? Bert ---------------------------------------- [opendtv] Re: Mobile DTV test Eory Frank wrote: Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 14:07:05 -0700 Oops. Sent the last one without typing my reply. Yes, IP licensing costs are becoming an increasing percentage of chip costs with each new level of integration. One solution is to make the license a percentage of the ASP (average selling price), rather than a fixed dollar amount -- if the IP owners can agree to that. I forget the exact figure, but at one time the MPEG2 royalty for DVD chips was a fixed dollar amount which would be ludicrous today, considering you can buy an DVD-player-on-a-chip -- everything but the drive mechanism itself, for something in the neighborhood of $10-$15 -- probably less, depending on who you are and what your volumes are. Suppse the IP royalty was $3/unit. 25-30% of the ASP to the IP owners of "the standard," while the chipmaker who invests millions to produce and support the chip (and adds value with his own IP) gets margins in the single digit percentages? That business model doesn't fly. That lead to things like we see in China, where they are developing thier own standards and their own IP, for the simple reason that the cost of licensing the "standard" IP is too prohibitive. Now fast forward a few years into the future, when virtually every TV set sold in the U.S. contains an ATSC receiver/decoder, MPEG2 video decoder, Dolby audio decoder, NTSC decoder, graphics engine, microprocessor, video scaling engine, etc. Now imagine that today's $200 TV sets will sell for $250 at retail (in equivalent 2004 dollars). The WILL sell for that small a premium, or they won't sell at all. Now back out the retail markup, the TV mfr markup and the chipmaker's markup. What do you think those chips will be selling for in 2007? My guess is around $10. How much of that $10 can possibly (without incurring a loss) be given to the large pool of IP owners? A few pennies to each of them? I remember reading once that Zenith/LGE was hoping to get $5/unit for the 8-VSB patents. How much will that royalty really turn out to be when 8-VSB is a small fraction of the chip area on a $10 chip? Tom brings up a valid point -- if the licensing cost of a particular IP block is too prohibitive, it will not be integrated. I would add the following corollary: whatever is not integrated will not be included in the product, except for those things that cannot be integrated for technical reasons (like maybe RF tuners). Regardless of mandates, etc., the end product will be made affordable. If there are one or two IP blocks that drive the cost through the roof, they will either find a niche market or they will disappear entirely. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.