Manfredi, Albert E wrote: >John Shutt wrote: > > > >>Unfortunately you don't understand the dynamics. >> >>We have been waiting in the United States since 1999 for >>a working receiver. We still don't have one on the market. >> COFDM would have changed that dynamic 6 years ago. >> >> > >Fairy tales, John. I don't believe that for a second. A >working receiver was demonstrated, and when the manufacturer >decided not to market the thing, the only loud complaints >we heard were from a few zealots on AVS Forum. I checked the >NAB site and found nothing on the subject. With Sinclair as >the only exception, I have to believe that Craig is right on >this one. Broadcasters are happier to retain the status quo. >The big concern is to delay analog shutoff and get multicast >must carry. > > > >>The only analogy one can draw with UHF and US DTV is the >>tuner mandate. >> >> > >Yes, and I believe that after analog is shut off, DTT will be >a good thing for broadcasters. But just like UHF, there's >this chicken and egg problem to get over first. > > > >>>Indoor reception of COFDM at that site is >>>still "unproven" (therefore presumably impossible). >>> >>> > >Tom Barry wrote: > > > >>That statement is illogical. The conclusion does not >>logically follow under any interpretation I can come up >>with. >> >>We have no idea of what sort of reception to expect at >>Mark's. >> >> > >Sorry, Tom, I'm simply being consistent with the prevalent >sentiments on this site. No test results are deemed credible >until demoed at Mark's apartment, and no product is deemed >feasible until it sits on a store shelf. > >Bob Miller wrote: > > > >>There is no cut off date in the UK and they have sold 6 million receivers. >> >> > >Yes, Bob, we've been over this many times. There is a cultural difference >between the UK, France, and Italy and >other parts of Europe and the US. OTA is used a lot in the former countries, >but not the latter. Why don't you argue >with Frank Eory on this subject? He's said the same thing. > >Bert > The cultural differenced between the US and Europe are over stated and in reverse. If COFDM had been allowed in the US our uptake would have been faster than the UK or Berlin. We are more into TV, watch more and spend a lot more on it. The US consumer would have/will go apes**t over a Freeview plus TopUpTV offering. The only thing in the way is the absence a decent receiver. If COFDM had been allowed in 2000 there were a dozen companies who would have been delivering innovative offerings over the last five years. One of the strengths of the US would have been been this trying of many ideas something that is not happening in other countries. By now much would have been sorted out. This could be happening in channels 51 and above but there to the digital transtagnation has put innovation in cement boots. The breakout will come one way or the other. Right now it is all about a decent receiver. A good modulation or a decent 8-VSB receiver would both work. Both are being delayed. You have to start wondering what is going on. As soon as I talk to someone who could make such a receiver something happens and the conversation drops. Interest is lost. Have a new 5th gen receiver, new company, on the way BTW. Don't hope for much but we will see. Bob Miller ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.