Craig Birkmaier wrote: > Stop the crap Bert. The former Harris employee was not talking about > a few big sticks. The system they envision uses the existing station > big stick as the master, with the cells as synchronized slaves to > make the whole thing work because of the problems with multi path > from the big stick. You mean, precisely what I just finished describing to you? My post April 12, 2014: "Think of it like this: In order to get the signal to hundreds of widely distributed towers, the broadcaster would figuratively still need that big stick to distribute the signal to the small sticks. And then the broadcaster would also have the burden of caring for the hundreds of small sticks. There's no free lunch. So in other words, the broadcaster still has the expense of the big stick, plus all the small sticks too, and you think this is a more likely way to keep FOTA TV economically viable? Very funny! > The station could do the same by adding cells in these more distant > communities. And the expensive, wired, synchronized backhaul network. And for the thousandth time, Craig. WHAT IS THE SPACING BETWEEN LTE TOWERS FOR SFN OPERATION, as a function of spectral efficiency? What does "adding cells in these more distant communities" even mean, when you have no clue how many cells that is? > These cells exist, they can be leased in whatever density is needed. First, what "exists" are towers, not transmitters. Secondly, what "exists" are towers spaced for unicast non-SFN service. You have to understand the limitations of SFNs, and understand the number of transmitters the broadcasters have to support, to speak intelligently about what's at stake here. Otherwise, you're just blowing smoke. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.