> > "Ingo Weinhold" <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] > > Mmh, that doesn't sound like something I like. If I understand you > > correctly, the file system needs to access other sessions than the > > one > > passed to it. > > Exactly, that's what the term multi-session is about! Generally, the > file system uses absolute (and not session relative) block numbers > for > multi-session volumes. That was something I had no idea about. I thought, sessions were not much different from partitions, only on a higher level (so that a session could contain several partitions). CU, Ingo