-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 28/02/14 09:32, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Martin Sustrik > <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I definitely plan to get back to nanomsg development, however, >> it probably won't happen in a short term. > > Thanks, that's good to hear. In the mean time, do you have any > suggestions on what the community can do to move nanomsg forward? > In particular, it would be useful if someone other than yourself > had access to the website, so that we could do a release. If you are actually willing to do that, I can grant you commit access to the repo (the website is part of the repo). I can also give access to Paul Colomiets, who happens to know the code the bast (AFAIK). I also have some "how to do a release" notes that I can send to you. Would that work? Martin -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTEHEoAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YILwIAJ2R6EaWR8DjvyPDrJcipjAo Ewy38j/IxkWgmsVU8P1PpbJY937pbvyYeGY8q7q+xtqe+KXlvoFm2nEinfxmqEZ/ pl2mFBtU/jIxmQxjeNtGZGoLNCMEolJxIDtbQfDGdpH5kquEwWmT/GPfwHI2WN9E Vp7Q0aLzf+SQhx95AGEmS18MN90H272j5ex1fHrmdoqS8M8uYhT220zPO9qZK8w9 zv77ZMZYTNzuvv6D0VpuZupzv8CtW/V2ZM/hXunstN3a/7bs3C/D9IdPiYA3FD1s rOXemJb/w/zM+pq6Q3Hcj19dmXRdEdMigbfEqX5iUwzHZv9S/4YVlg8rPDDNMIA= =9GhY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----