[nanomsg] Re: Status
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 12:25:27 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Matt,
> And for that matter, how do you feel about continued use of the
> name nanomsg for releases no longer under your leadership
> (particularly as 250bpm claims the trademark)? I guess it depends
> on how much you agree with the direction, but that is hard to tell
> in advance.
The trademark thing is good only for preventing confusion caused by
several products with the same name.
In case you are interested in using a derivative name, e.g.
"matts-nanomsg", I am perfectly OK with that.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTEHInAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YwnQIAKiD95n/az3ihvN2zF+9h/17
RBVNHCegFszdgxomXkYEJCYYYUScfjRQwfSKsNjXyADI8In6Nts6bQmvV2RXHSMb
HCe8e8uLCD0LJtaZfP7k2N+0Qyk8+Sceyu0ZJ/6dx+SsfjCKN2AWA4Epa83gVzEj
Bf+iLT8YXaINfolYOWr1F3EkfcxOImS6McH7i2xQ3CtqtNgl/ox9QkrM19bnzCmy
7uMZtbJa0x8XzZ/NP+owncvkjvUvRfBZvBkpwkJmervqFi7fYGUbOkxhkzN8Lo1m
YWXJAqi5tDUSjSOTM4J4MJ32WgWstJOIC8YwCloNJpwPZdoSviZxPgTY2QtE/uA=
=uK76
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
