[nanomsg] Re: Status
- From: Martin Sustrik <sustrik@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: nanomsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 14:05:31 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
> So two pull requests left. They are pretty trivial. But the
> question is license issue. You have requested either statement in
> each patch, or the personal email that all following patches of the
> author will be MIT licensed. So should you publish a list of such
> authors? Or we just require statement in every patch? (Or is this
> rule already obsolete?)
You should ask people to provide a statement that they are submitting
the patch under MIT license.
Every such person is added to thr AUTHORS file.
Martin
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTEdsWAAoJENTpVjxCNN9YQTYH/3RTqFbx82UdA5sbwX4cm4eb
QmjvN+DNFn9mU3Sc+4HomrjmyBZMq4An+qYc+noMEK8L8dP/+YJKA33FSuSJynuu
hJ97ni+sjcnsFtoYlP6g29SYIH2bPI2+hspFMuzBYQzkOORJYu9KnpwAQM6eHSBp
tQ5pxyiWIiG66xkG9BEEsI04HamZzfijSxGnDrYtE1NWua1dYwLSHuEaSv1xHQRk
M2fad6JqYQ+FKXv2B3uHHeMl5Pfw7hiH46E1Md1rlESSAPz9In4m4t6QKDyOfYE9
t3r+IcBrifd/WzE3EDCalq/EyoI8tD1EhvWPSWuQPsIZK2SZLVhUmVvPjdzR5n0=
=nGMM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Other related posts:
