Gerhard Kuhn wrote: > Apple Works is fine but it is more at the level of Microsoft Works than MS > Office. I use a spreadsheet on a daily basis and the spreadsheet in Apple > Works just doesn't cut it, I need to have the ability to have 32 pages per > work book. I know that with works you can organize your sheets in folders > and get a similar effect but it is not as nice or easy to navigate as with > tabs in Excel. > > Gerhard Using 32 worksheets sounds like you are doing a lot of data management with inter realtionships from one sheet to the next. You likely should be using a data management program rather than a spreadsheet unless of course you are doing some _really_ intensive number crunching. Going back to AW. In other words is MS Works Word (for lack of a better term) a lousy word processor that no one need use because MS Office has MS Word? Do you think MS Works would provide most people all the wp, ss or db that they need? My guess is likely. The only reason most people use the Office suite is because that is what they use at work so that's what they get. Nothing like having a Lamborgini contact for a word processor on your desk. (That comparison might be generous! Perhaps a Mercedes 600 series? There are other word processors out there that some suggest are better than word. (McDonalds has served billions but does that make them good?) Martin _________________________________________________ For information concerning the MUGLO List just click on http://muglo.on.ca/Pages/joinus.html Don't forget to periodically check our web site at: http://muglo.on.ca/