[mswindowsxp] Re: Spice girls' vocal concert

  • From: "Charles R. Buchanan" <crbgfblab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <mswindowsxp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2002 20:12:14 -0800

Sorry for the confusion, I actually have the program called Outpost. That is
what I was referring to! My Bad!

>-----Original Message-----
>From: mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Neil Atwood
>Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 7:59 PM
>To: mswindowsxp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [mswindowsxp] Re: Spice girls' vocal concert
>
>
>
>=20
>Doesn't rename then here Charles - just destroys them!
>There's nothing for the AV software to intercept...
>
>Personally, the security of Outlook is one of the best things MS has
>done for the app.
>
>BTW - calling it 'Outpost' is a tad confusing, because there is an app
>with that name.. ;-)
>
>Regards
>
>____________________________________
>,,,,,   Neil Atwood - natwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>=D4=BF=D4=AC    Sydney, Australia
>
>Frisbeetarianism: The belief that when you die, your soul goes up on the
>roof and gets stuck.
> =20
>-----Original Message-----
>From: mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Charles R.
>Buchanan
>Sent: Sunday, 15 December 2002 12:24 PM
>To: mswindowsxp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Since it seems everything goes through Outpost first, it's the first to
>see any attachment, which it automatically renames them, the Outlook
>(2k) gets it, and Norton intercepts. I believe that's how it works here.
>Happens so fast, it's hard to say for certain! :-)
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:mswindowsxp-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Neil Atwood
>>Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 5:20 PM
>>To: mswindowsxp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [mswindowsxp] Re: Spice girls' vocal concert
>>
>>
>>
>>=3D20
>>Got it here too... But I'm curious how many people's antivirus find it.
>>
>>With Outlook setup right, my antivirus never gets near the worm/virus,=20
>>because Outlook deals with it first.
>>I haven't had my av trigger a warning for more than a year... And yet I
>
>>have no problems with not being able to receive attachments that I want
>
>>to receive...
>>
>>Outlook 2002 and 2000 (with SP's) and OE 6 (with patches) should all do
>
>>this 'out of the box'
>>
>>Regards
>>____________________________________
>>,,,,,   Neil Atwood - natwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>=3DD4=3DBF=3DD4=3DAC    Sydney, Australia
>
>
>---
>It's lights OUT for you viruses!
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>3D=3D=3D=
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://thethin.net/winxplist.cfm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>==================================
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://thethin.net/winxplist.cfm
>
---
It's lights OUT for you viruses!
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.427 / Virus Database: 240 - Release Date: 12/6/2002








==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/winxplist.cfm

Other related posts: