[modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?

From: Marty <martyb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: modular-debian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:33:01 -0500

My dream distro is Go for system apps and Groovy/Dalvik for GUI apps,
because I'm cool[1] and Google promised to do no wrong and you pick
up Android as a bonus, for what it's worth.

I even wonder if Gobolinux would pick Go over Lua today?

[1] We are all cool kids because nobody mentioned Guile yet.

Follow-Ups:
- [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?
  - From: Miles Fidelman
- [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?
  - From: Andrew McGlashan

References:
- [modular-debian] Fwd: Re: Why focus on systemd?
  - From: Miles Fidelman
- [modular-debian] Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?
  - From: Steve Litt
- [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?
  - From: Reco

Other related posts:

» [modular-debian] Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Steve Litt
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Miles Fidelman
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Joel Roth
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Reco
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd? - Marty
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Miles Fidelman
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Miles Fidelman
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Steve Litt
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Andrew McGlashan
» [modular-debian] Re: Packaging: was Why focus on systemd?- Marty