I just call that a pin nut or face nut and pin spanner. Cheers Jeff Dayman ----- Original Message ----- From: "Harry Wade" <hww@xxxxxxxx> To: <modeleng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 5:13 PM Subject: [modeleng] Pistons was 3½ vs 5, Sweet Pea > At 09:27 PM 9/26/05 +0100, you wrote: > >Works on the 12" to the ft scale ok John, why not in 5" - Dave > > I have never known of a single instance where a threaded piston > connection (meaning for anything other than retaining nut), was used in > full size. Certainly there may very well have been, but it would have been > the extreme exception rather than the rule. > IF you intend to use a fully threaded connection, and I've done so > myself (but won't again), the thing to do is start the thread in the lathe > (between centers, in collet, or indicated in a 4-jaw) with a single point > tool. This assures axial alignment (& concentricity) of the thread form, > and you have the option of running on a die for final shaping. Then, more > importantly, the piston should be finish turned to final OD on the rod > between centers to insure concentricity between the rod and piston OD. On > my current loco project I intend to use a short tapered shank retained by a > recessed nut as described next. > Another question . . . I cannot for the life of me remember the name > of the type of nut & spanner combination where the nut has two holes > drilled in the face and the spanner is adjustable with studs which fit into > the holes. Refresh my memory? > > Regards, > Harry > > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. > > To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, > modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line. > MODEL ENGINEERING DISCUSSION LIST. To UNSUBSCRIBE from this list, send a blank email to, modeleng-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word "unsubscribe" in the subject line.