RE: Socket library?
- From: William Adams <william_a_adams@xxxxxxx>
- To: "luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:20:26 +0000
I would personally find value in having that LibUV binding standalone.
I was contemplating a wholesale switch to using Luvit, or grabbing the binding,
or just doing the whole Windows layer again, without all the by-value callbacks.
If you make the binding readily available, that will at least be one more
option.
I find the hardest part about C code is getting the projects to build reliably
on my windows system. If you make that part really easy, bonus and good Karma
to you.
-- William
----------------------------------------
> Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 19:12:41 -0500
> Subject: Re: Socket library?
> From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> I can make my libuv bindings standalone to work with stock luajit if
> there is value in that. The library itself will be a binary addon to
> luajit since it will staticly include libuv and C API bindings to it.
> (ffi can't be used for libuv since it's callback heavy and uses some
> by-val return values and parameters)
>
>
Other related posts:
