Re: Socket library?
- From: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: luajit@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:30:29 -0700
Thanks for mentioning Luvit and libuv - I'm checking them out as well.
On a related note, is there a plan to get LuaJIT packaged for the
major Linux distros (Fedora, Ubuntu, openSUSE?) I'd like to have
LuaJIT on Fedora so I can package and run LuaAV there.
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Richard Hundt <richardhundt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2012, at 2:20 AM, William Adams wrote:
>
>> I would personally find value in having that LibUV binding standalone.
>
> I've been playing with exactly this at: https://github.com/richardhundt/luv
>
> The code there is *very* fresh (less than 2 weeks old), and I've shamelessly
> stolen some pieces from Luvit (soz Tim, I haven't gotten around to adding
> proper credits yet, other than a few comments in the sources), but what I'm
> aiming for is doing away with callbacks in favour of suspending an resuming
> coroutines (and threads) for a more linear programming style.
>
> It also provides binary serialization and ØMQ integration for painless
> multithreading. It's a fast moving target, with serious bugs lurking, no
> doubt, but I'm having fun with it :)
>
> Cheers,
> Richard
>
>
>
--
Twitter: http://twitter.com/znmeb; Computational Journalism Publishers
Workbench: http://j.mp/QCsXOr
How the Hell can the lion sleep with all those people singing "A weem
oh way!" at the top of their lungs?
Other related posts:
