[lit-ideas] Re: small addendum to Matrix as philosophy

  • From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:16:32 -0800

From: "Paul Stone" <pas@xxxxxxxx>

> This is the +PRIMARY+ objection I have to "intelligent design". It just 
> doesn't seem too 
> intelligent.

That's perhaps the best argument against "intelligent design"; it's too random 
to be 
intelligent. Two dozen types of eyes, thousands of different kinds of sea 
plankton that all 
do the same thing, an Earth that has been bombarded by massive asteroids and 
all life forms 
nearly wiped out some six times: that's not design in any meaningful sense.


To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

Other related posts: