[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- From: Robert Paul <robert.paul@xxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:45:45 -0800
(1) White phosphorus is not primarily a chemical weapon,' but see the
claim below about the effects of a WP 'plume.'
(2) The use of white phosphorus is not banned by any treaty. Its use in
certain ways and against certain targets is. The references to certain
weapons being banned for use against civilians are curious; all weapons
are banned for use against civilians: there is no such thing as a
'civilian target.'
(3) Judy and I have posted references to these points earlier. (Judy
posted a section from the relevant international treaty.)
Here's a piece from the Christian Science Monitor of 8 November. Note
that it refers to events of a year ago.
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1108/dailyUpdate.html?s=mesdu
Did the US military use chemical weapons in Iraq?
An Italian state-run TV documentary says yes, a charge the US calls
'disinformation.'
By Tom Regan | csmonitor.com
RAI, the all news state-run satellite channel in Italy, aired a
documentary Tuesday that accused the United States of using chemical
weapons against the civilian population during a November 2004
bombardment of Fallujah. AKI, the Italian news agency, reports that the
documentary, entitled "Fallujah: The Hidden Massacre" and aired on the
first aniversary of the assault on insurgents in Fallujah, includes
interviews with former US soldiers and with residents of Fallujah who
say that during the assault on the city the US military used the
chemical white phosphorus.
"I heard the order being issued to be careful because white phosphorus
was being used on Fallujah. In military slang this is known as Willy
Pete. Phosphorus burns bodies, melting the flesh right down to the
bone," says one former US solider, interviewed by the documentary's
director, Sigfrido Ranucci.
"I saw the burned bodies of women and children. The phosophorous
explodes and forms a plume. Who ever is within a 150 metre radius has no
hope," the former soldier adds.
RAI says the use of white phosphorus in built-up areas amounts to the
illegal use of chemical weapons, although the BBC notes that such bombs
are considered incendiary devices. The US military admits to using the
weapon to illuminate battlefields in Iraq, and says it did so in
Fallujah, but insists it did not use it in civilian areas. Washington is
not a signatory of an international treaty restricting white phosphorus
devices.
La Repubblica, the Italian newspaper which recently broke the story on
the Italian government's involvement with the forged Niger-Iraq uranium
documents, reports the documentary also broadcast what it claimed is
proof of the use in Iraq of a new napalm formula called MK77. The use of
the incendiary substance on civilians is forbidden by a 1980 UN treaty.
The use of chemical weapons is forbidden by a treaty that the US signed
in 1997.
The Independent reports that ever since the assault, "rumours have
swirled that the Americans used chemical weapons on the city." But the
US denied the charges last year, saying "The fighting in Fallujah, Iraq
has led to a number of widespread myths including false charges that the
United States is using chemical weapons such napalm and poison gas. None
of these allegations are true."
The United States categorically denies the use of chemical weapons at
any time in Iraq, which includes the ongoing Fallujah operation.
Furthermore, the United States does not under any circumstance support
or condone the development, production, acquisition, transfer or use of
chemical weapons by any country. All chemical weapons currently
possessed by the United States have been declared to the Organization
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) and are being destroyed
in the United States in accordance with our obligations under the
Chemical Weapons Convention.
The US also denied charges by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the leader of Al
Qaeda in Iraq, that US forces were using "poisonous gases" during a
recent battle in the Iraqi city of Tall Afar, saying "those who wish to
discredit the United States find it useful to invent the false charge
that the United States is using such weapons. "
The Independent reports, however, that the documentary offers video and
photographs it alleges proves that the white phosphorus was used
"indiscriminately" on both insurgents and the civilian population.
Photographs on the website of RaiTG24, the broadcaster's 24-hours news
channel, show exactly what the former [US] soldier means. Provided by
the Studies Centre of Human Rights in Fallujah, dozens of high-quality,
colour close-ups show bodies of Fallujah residents, some still in their
beds, whose clothes remain largely intact but whose skin has been
dissolved .... or turned the consistency of leather by the shells.
The BBC reports that the US denounced the documentary as
"disinformation." It aired a day after Iraq's president, Jalal Talabani,
came to Italy for a five-day visit.
The documentary began with formerly classified footage of the Americans
using napalm bombs during the Vietnam War. The film repeated accusations
that Washington has systematically attempted to destroy filmed evidence
of the alleged use of chemical weapons in the attack on Falluja last
November.
Italian public opinion has been consistently against the war and the RAI
documentary can only reinforce calls here for a pullout of Italian
soldiers as soon as possible, our correspondent says.
Last March 3, an article in AlJazeera.com (a site different than the one
for the more familiar Al Jazzera satellite TV channel) carried a report
that alleged a Dr. Khalid ash Shaykhli, an Iraqi health ministry
official, told a Baghdad press conference that the US military had used
internationally banned chemical weapons, including nerve gas. The US
information service wrote later that month that the story of Dr.
Shaykhli was fabricated, and claimed the press conference never took place.
-----------
Robert Paul
Reed College
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit