[lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- From: Judy Evans <judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 14:56:49 +0000
Wednesday, November 16, 2005, 2:36:09 PM, Eric Yost wrote:
EY> Citation of the level of Iraqi conscripts from a British reporter:
EY> A British correspondent, Stephen Sackur, happened to come across
EY> the remains of an Iraqi convoy that had "panicked, seizing any
EY> vehicle that looked capable of taking them to Iraq before the
EY> Allies could close in." The scale of the American attack on this
EY> helpless convoy appalled him:
EY> Was it necessary to bomb the entire convoy? What threat
EY> could these pathetic remnants of Saddam Hussein's beaten army
EY> have posed? Wasn't it obvious that the people of the convoy would
EY> have given themselves up willingly without the application of
EY> such ferocious weaponry? The hundreds who, by some miracle, did
EY> survive were duly taken prisoner.
Who did this unnecessary bombing, Eric?
They included *two women* and a
EY> *child*
members of a conscript army?
I'll try once more then give up. People here are not saying Saddam
wasn't a criminal and a mass murderer. Your yelling that he was is
counterproductive.
--
Judy Evans, Cardiff, UK
mailto:judithevans1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Willie Pete, well, okay, a little bit